Talk:Lucie Silvas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What the hell is Lucie Silvas management and record company doing, with a total of 10,000 album sales, they have not promoted her 2007 , not advetised the new album, on radio or t.v. and basically are crap. She need a new record label, as Lucie should be as KT Tunstall, and up for a brit award.Its outrageous how she has been treated in the U.K with no support, marketing, or promotions, she should sack them all, and go over to virgin.

The odd thing is, Mercury records did a good job with the first album, but have now dropped her, how can they aford to do that, the whole management seem to be a joke, I just hope Lucie knows what is happening.

Lucie Silvas: Great singer and an exceptionally talented song-writer. Any1 disagree??

Contents 1 A year? 2 :) 2.1 The game is won 3 Date of birth (moved from main page)

[edit] A year?

"Having been in the business for almost a year, Lucie has a UK tour, a platinum album and 4 top 40 singles already under her belt..."

Hasn't she been the business for at least six years seeing she recorded her first album in 2000?

[edit]  :)

shes great. shame shes not doing so well.

"In 2003, Lucie was signed to Mercury Records, and given a long time to write her debut album, "Breathe In." " - Does "Forget Me Not" not count then? JP Godfrey 18:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The game is won

In the Dutch article about Lucie Silvas there is something that some critics predicted that her third single The game is won would be number 1. Does anybody know if that is true? 83.128.5.95 18:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

The dutch article sais: "Ondanks het feit dat verschillende Engelse critciti voorspelden dat dit nummer de eerste nummer 1-hit voor Lucie Silvas zou worden, kwam de single zeer teleurstellend niet hoger dan nr. 38 in de Britse charts" which means that they predicted it to be a #1 hit, but it didn't reach higher dan #38. So no, it's not true. Luigi-ish 19:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I actually meant: is it true that the critics predicted this single to get to number 1. Because I know predictions can be way off, but there is a enormous difference between number 1 and number 38. I can't imagine them being so wrong. 83.128.6.80 16:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Date of birth (moved from main page)

This DoB may be incorrect as her website states she is 29. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.6.22 (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)