User talk:Lozen8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Antistasiology
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Antistasiology, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kinu t/c 22:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
What would you suggest I do to improve the article to satisfy your concerns regarding verifiability? The only link I have been able to find on the subject so far is on Frank Discussion's own website itself where he gives a brief definition and history here. I will include the link and hopefully that will settle this to everyone's satisfaction.
Lozen8 01:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Feederz"
The discussion above regarding "Antistasiology," which I have read in its entirety, indicates a history of adding irrelevant content connected with the band Feederz. I neither know nor care what your connection to the band is---if you add that irrelevant content to the Situationist article again, I will delete it. If necessary, I will bring other editors and/or administrators into this matter. Do not leave any further messages on my talk page, please. If you wish to discuss this matter further, post on the Situationist article talk page. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 17:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

