Talk:Lost and Safe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Electronic music, set up to organize and expand entries on Electronic music. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] "Professional Reviews"
Regarding the 'not professional reviews' revision: While I agree that some of the reviews you removed don't belong on the Wikipedia article, Dusted and Cokemachineglow are at least as "professional" as Play Louder, Stylus, and TMT. What was your rationale for choosing which reviews stayed? I also think that section needs cleanup, but it should be more than just randomly removing reviews. Matthew McVickar (talk) 09:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
---- ---
I have removed the part about this album being in the same "aleatoric style" as the previous albums. While aleatory is a word that The Books have liked to use a lot in their songs, aleatory is not really a STYLE of music. Music CAN be aleatoric in its nature, but The Books largely do not make music in this way. You can read more in the interview here on Hatesomethingbeautiful.com. CharCoal (talk) 03:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
