Talk:Loren Cass

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on March 29, 2007. The result of the discussion was delete.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on May 6, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.
Maintenance A plot summary needs to be added to this film article, or the current one needs to be expanded.

[edit] Long Quote

The second paragraph of the introdution is a 127-word quote from Neil Young's Film Lounge. This seems to limit the neutrality of the article as the quote is placed so prominently. - SCgatorFan 03:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Crew

Why is there a list of crew? The last ten Oscar winners for best picture do not list crew. Is this article just going to be an advertisment and rehash of the credits? - SCgatorFan 03:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated Article Editing

This article used to have details and sources on the project, and has been systematically reduced to a few paragraphs. I'm not sure where these people come from, but adding things like "received uniformly terrible reviews" is obviously biased, with no sources given, and links to actual reviews have repeatedly been removed. How come Wikipedia editors don't notice the negative bias edits, whereas a link to a positive review was removed by the individual above because it was "placed so prominently"? Perhaps the placement should have been made less prominent instead of removed, Scgatorfan.