Talk:LJM
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the Greater Houston area. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project where you join the group and contribute to the discussion. |
 |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Start | rated as start-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
LJM was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: March 10, 2007 |
[edit] GA failed
This fails almost every single one of the GA criteria. Please view these criteria, and expand the article considerably with sources and inline citations before nominating again. --Nehrams2020 23:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to fail it again for the same reasons as before. All questionable information should have inline citations and you should have more sources within the article. If possible, add an image or two that has an appropriate license and fair use rationale if necessary. The article needs a lot more expansion, because right now it is looking more like a stub, or very early stages start class. I'd recommend looking at a lot of other GAs to get a better idea of articles that meet the criteria or more ideas for expansion (look at the business articles). Although new information was added in the last attempt, that still needs to be sourced as well. Let me know if you have any questions and I'll try to get back to you as soon as I can. Although the article is a long way off from a GA, keep expanding and citing, and it may one day be a GA. Remember to review the GA criteria. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 21:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Does it still fail GA or can it get higher now? 128.32.225.98 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
