Talk:Living in the Material World
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>
- All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rolling Stone Review
I added the five star rating to the Rolling Stone interview despite the lack of a specific score rating in the review. I'd like other users to read the review and give their input as to whether this is a 5/5 review. It's a rather spectacular review - I've only rarely seen something this deep, effusive, and glowing. And I feel as though including a score on the Wikipedia page is much more helpful than merely a link, and that we're qualified to approximate where not listed, when the implied rating is obvious (as sanctioned by consensus). 140.247.43.222 06:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews. You should not represent reviews without an explicit rating as such. Rather you should summarize it with a term like "(favorable)" or "(very favorable)". Also note that magazine names should be italicized. I've reverted your change. --PEJL 10:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks - I had a feeling the consensus-based approach to starred ratings was not an official Wikipedia policy. Did you, or anyone else, have a chance to read through the review? If so, how do you reckon we label it? Shall we quote one or two words, or write the generic "(extremely) favorable"? 140.247.252.50 05:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Nope, haven't read it. Using a standard phrasing like "extremely favorable" would be favorable, for consistency. --PEJL 13:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LivingintheMaterialWorldalbumcover.jpg
Image:LivingintheMaterialWorldalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

