Talk:Living in the Material World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Start
This article has
been rated as
Start-Class
on the
assessment scale.
  This George Harrison-related article is within the scope of The Beatles WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of The Beatles, Apple Records, George Martin, Brian Epstein/NEMS, and related topics. You are more than welcome to join the project and/or contribute to discussion.


Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


[edit] <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

[edit] Rolling Stone Review

I added the five star rating to the Rolling Stone interview despite the lack of a specific score rating in the review. I'd like other users to read the review and give their input as to whether this is a 5/5 review. It's a rather spectacular review - I've only rarely seen something this deep, effusive, and glowing. And I feel as though including a score on the Wikipedia page is much more helpful than merely a link, and that we're qualified to approximate where not listed, when the implied rating is obvious (as sanctioned by consensus). 140.247.43.222 06:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews. You should not represent reviews without an explicit rating as such. Rather you should summarize it with a term like "(favorable)" or "(very favorable)". Also note that magazine names should be italicized. I've reverted your change. --PEJL 10:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks - I had a feeling the consensus-based approach to starred ratings was not an official Wikipedia policy. Did you, or anyone else, have a chance to read through the review? If so, how do you reckon we label it? Shall we quote one or two words, or write the generic "(extremely) favorable"? 140.247.252.50 05:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Nope, haven't read it. Using a standard phrasing like "extremely favorable" would be favorable, for consistency. --PEJL 13:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LivingintheMaterialWorldalbumcover.jpg

Image:LivingintheMaterialWorldalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)