Talk:Live blood analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Providence journal

• Do you have another reference that would allow access to the document ? I would like to read it. NATTO 05:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Validity of live blood cell analysis

• Looking at this topic in more detail, it looks like live blood cell analysis with dark field microscopy is a valid technique. The problem lies more with some of the claims made by some users as they are not properly of sufficiently validated by published research. US State agencies seem to see a benefit in this form a lab analysis and suggest proper regulation instead of elimination, to insure public protection against unqualified users. We have to be careful no to throw the baby with the water so to speak. NATTO 05:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Odd comment

I found this odd comment. "We know today, from the use of Darkfield Microscopes that microorganisms are pleomorphic, that they can change and often do. A virus can become a bacterium which can mutate into a yeast or fungus. Modern medicine has yet to acknowledge this because it would turn the pharmaceutical interests on their backs like a helpless tortoise." I found it here. What I would like to know is where this person got this idea from. I can understand the theories of the medical industry being all about money. The question is though... can anyone find information as to what gave this person the idea that microorganisms are pleomorphic? Might help with the article, and might merit an inclusion as something to debunk, if information can be found on this idea. SadanYagci 20:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)