Talk:Liutprand of Cremona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
Middle Ages Icon Liutprand of Cremona is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


This should be moved to Liutprand of Cremona and Liutprand turned into a disambiguation page for this guy, the king of the Lombards, and the duke of Benevento of the same name. Too many links here should direct to the king. Srnec 03:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Andrew Dalby 13:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Very sensible. --Wetman 07:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Certainly. —Ian Spackman 11:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Done. Now some of the links to the dab page need to be fixed... Srnec 03:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

Should have an image of him.--24.245.71.96 20:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC) user:Akako

[edit] wording

some of the sentences in this article are nondescript and need to be reworded by a person who knows this subject. "and was born to a good family." Good family? what does this mean? Privaliged? Rich? Freindly? Skilled? It could be any.

I too think it's awkward and probably translated. I will work on it one day when I have time. ~Tozmo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tozmo (talkcontribs) 00:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Cathenc (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09313a.htm) describes the family as ‘distinguished’. I’ll change ‘good’ to ‘prominent’. —Ian Spackman 08:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)