Talk:Little Lord Fauntleroy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was a commercial success for its author, set fashion trends and also set a precedent in copyright law.
- what precedent?Pedant 01:02, 2004 Oct 27 (UTC)
- good question--clarified in article; see Frances Hodgson Burnett for more Quill 07:36, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
-
- "Still popular"? I read Little Lord Fauntleroy when I was about nine— and was wise enough already to be repelled by its saccharine tone— but I'm quite sure few of you have! A book that was already so utterly faded and stale during the Eisenhower administration can scarcely be rivetting the depleted attention spans of today, no? The book is not popular but notorious, to be perfectly frank: everyone has heard about it. But none of you have read it!--Wetman (talk) 05:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
This book IS overly sentimental. But the facts that it is still in print AND that it has several film versions shows the basic Fauntleroy story still appeals to people. I have read the book both as a child and an adult. I personally liked it even tho the big crisis is solved through an incredible coincidence. The 1936 film starring the great 1930's child actor Freddie Bartholomew had an "A" list cast and producer...and is still good (except for needing a technical cleanup of pictures and sound).Victorianezine (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)victorianezine
Categories: Novel has incomplete Book infobox | 19th century novels task force articles | Start-Class 19th century novels task force articles | High-importance 19th century novels task force articles | Start-Class novel articles | High-importance novel articles | Film articles without infoboxes | Stub-Class film articles | Low-importance film articles | Wikipedia requested film images | Films that need a synopsis | Articles that need a cast section | Stub-Class children and young adult literature articles | High-importance children and young adult literature articles

