Talk:Little David
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this a joke? It looks reduculous if find it hard to belive that even the Americans would build this.
Hardly. Besides, America has built a variety of super-large guns in the past. 99.246.218.119 05:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:MILHIST Assessment
Needs expansion. Also, is this a single particular mortar launcher, or a class/make of them? I'm sure that's obvious to any WWII history buff, but I'm afraid not to me (and therefore to the average reader). LordAmeth 00:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Contradiction
How can the article claim that "Little David is still the artillery piece with the largest caliber in history" although it mentions two other artillery pieces with the same calibre, which are older and one of which was actually used in combat? Burschik 12:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe it should be changed to Little David is still one of the artillery pieces with the largest caliber in history? This will render it correct and keep the article pretty much the same. I will change it right away. MythSearchertalk 12:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Military technology and engineering task force articles | World War II task force articles | Start-Class military history articles | Military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation | Military history articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy | Military history articles needing attention to structure

