Talk:List of defunct English football stadia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten.
List This article has been rated as list-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.
WikiProject on Football The article on List of defunct English football stadia is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
List This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the England task force.

I'm not sure what this list is aiming to be. It would probably be better dealt with on individual club pages. If not it needs to be more clearly defined. e.g. How far back does the list go? How high in the football pyramid does a club have to be before inclusion? What is the difference between defunct stadia and redeveloped stadia (e.g. Bournemouth in the list)? Nuttah68 21:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

The reason I created it was that the List of English football stadia by capacity, which included these, was too long. It certainly needs expanding and a bit of work on it at the moment though; I baisically copied it from the other page. Put simply, a defunct stadium is one that has been completely demolished and is no longer used. Wembley and Bournemouth are here because, although built on the same land, the stadia are compeltely new.--Robdurbar 07:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The trouble with redeveloped grounds is that none of the original ground survives at Charlton, Manchester United and Tottenham (and probably many more). Does Old Trafford belong on this list? Nuttah68 08:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Does the original structure not stand though? My impression with Bournemouth and Wembley is that they have compeltely torn it down and started again; these other grounds may have been redeveloped, perhaps even compeltely gutted, but their basic foundations/external strucutre has been retained. If this is wrong, then we should remvoe the 'redeveloped on the same site' and just have those stadia that have been torn down entirely on the list. --Robdurbar 08:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

No, the grounds have been totally redeveloped. The Valley was the largest ground in English football. Half of the site of the original stadium is now a supermarket. Nuttah68 08:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
By this logic, most grounds that have been around for at least 40/50 years should be included! What happens when Fratton Park is redeveloped so that it is turned through 90o? What about Deepdale, when the redevelopment of each side is completed?[1] Or St Andrews?[2] I will talk about Bramall Lane, as I know it well. I 1967, the Bramall Lane Stand was knocked down and rebuilt. The South stand was build in 1975, the Kop demolished and rebuilt in the 80's and the John Street Stand demolished in 1994 and rebuilt in 1996. Three corners have no been filled in, two with seating and one with a business centre. Is Bramall Lane prior to 1967 now ready for inclusion on this list? L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Then we should leave this as compeltly 'defunct' (as in those in the category with a similar title). --Robdurbar 08:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criteria

As far as I'm concerned, anyone who's been in the football league or conference at any time is fair game for this list; in addition, any stadia that have been used by England naitonal teams. --Robdurbar 07:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)