Talk:List of Tiny Toon Adventures episodes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge
Because some people cannot understand the concept of using a global consensus instead of discussion for the sake of discussing, especially when there are no actual editors here to discuss, I have placed merge tags. If no sources are provided, these will be redirected in a week. I am not going to play any "Not enough people discussed, so there is no consensus" games, so please don't try. I hope I didn't really offend anyone, but because of the fact that the reverting of the redirects was not done out of good faith, it's sort of hard not to be gruff. TTN (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- What is the rush to do this? I urge you to wait until the results of the ongoing "Episodes and characters" Request for Arbitration has finished. Astronaut (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- They are not making a content decision, and even though I'm not bothering to read it, I can only assume that the worst possible outcome for myself is that I can no longer revert multiple times for a while. As I am not reverting these, there is no need to wait for an irrelevant discussion to be over. TTN (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- "...the worst possible outcome..." - I strongly urge you to read and participate in the RfA. It is far from irrelavant. Astronaut (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant to just suggesting a merge after someone reverts my initial redirects. Anyways, it's a pointless endeavor for myself because far too many of the parties there are participating for "non-pure" reasons. If it had only the single motive of doing away with edit warring, I probably would bother with it. TTN (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree. Because in every merge I've seen, there has been a loss of information. To whomsoever created this article, I salute you... maybe. Reason being is that there are people I just don't like. Lesser Shadow (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant to just suggesting a merge after someone reverts my initial redirects. Anyways, it's a pointless endeavor for myself because far too many of the parties there are participating for "non-pure" reasons. If it had only the single motive of doing away with edit warring, I probably would bother with it. TTN (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- "...the worst possible outcome..." - I strongly urge you to read and participate in the RfA. It is far from irrelavant. Astronaut (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- They are not making a content decision, and even though I'm not bothering to read it, I can only assume that the worst possible outcome for myself is that I can no longer revert multiple times for a while. As I am not reverting these, there is no need to wait for an irrelevant discussion to be over. TTN (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- This was a feature length (albeit straight ot video) movie, not just a regular episode of the show. So I disagree with any merger. I am referring to Tiny Toon Adventures: How I Spent My Vacation. TJ Spyke 09:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- it was painful - but i loved the cartoon, so i read through all the epidose articles. Not a single one has enough substantial plot to justify anything over a paragraph or two, which is completely mergeable. Three articles have potential for remaining full sub-articles, the first episode, the movie, and the banned episode - and that's only because these could realistically contain real-world info: ciritical reception, and bannign details. The fact that they don't have it yet is irrelevant (no time limit). IMO, a good rule of thumb is that highly episodic tv shows rarely need episode pages.
- HOWEVER, because of the injunction, this really should wait. TTN, there are things i want to do too, and even though we rarely agree on method, it would be less incindiery of you to hold off on this. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 19:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
