Talk:List of Intel codenames
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Harpertown - eight or quad core?
it is listed as quad-core, but in this section (and on main Xeon page) it says it's 8-core. I beleive it should be listed as quad-core, regaldless of 2P configurations.
The Family/Model/Stepping column seems totally unnecessary given that only two entries out of dozens make use of it. I will remove it in a few days if there are no objections. 208.66.208.200 19:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] adding column with year of introdcution?
I think that a column should be added with the year of introduction. Andries 11:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not a bad idea. Two remarks: 1) Some codenames relate to products that were never introduced. 2) Good luck on finding all the dates. It must be possible but it's going to be a lot of work (but then again so was composing this list in the first place). The Seventh Taylor 13:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adding sortable column of prodct?
Wouldn't it make sense to add a column of what product the codename corresponds to, such as Processor, Centrino Platform, Chipset, etc., and thus have it sortable for users? I'll see what I can do later today. Suigi (talk) 00:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tillamook
Tillamook, an older mobile Pentium processor is missing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.67.144.184 (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Almador core
There is no such county as "Almador" county in california. There is an "Amador" but that's all. Thus to speculate that the Almador codename is a CA county is incorrect.149.136.17.253 (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- There is according to List of school districts in California. Do I misunderstand something here? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 06:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
