Talk:List of Australian capital cities
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Canberra the Capital of the ACT?
I somehow doubt this. Canberra is the seat of the federal government and the capital city of the nation. The ACT does not have a capital city as such. Canberra is the only city in the ACT and therefore by default is the informal "capital", but formally that is not its status. JackofOz 02:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- No that's incorrect. Canberra is the capital of the ACT as well. JRG 06:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- In which sense? It could be called the capital simply because it is the seat of government, but it is not formally declared the capital, is it? It does seem a bit bizarre to describe Canberra as the captial of the territory that was created only to contain Canberra. JPD (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- But it doesn't. There are a number of small settlements outside Canberra city which are still part of the ACT. But I can't find a source on the net showing that Canberra is the ACT's capital, although that's what everyone's always been taught... JRG 14:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure - just because it seems bizarre doesn't mean it's wrong, but what do you mean by "outside Canberra city", anyway? I don't the extent of the city is defined in any legal sense. For what it's worth, I've never been taught that Canberra is the ACT's capital. I have been taught that London is the UK's capital though, and that has never been proclaimed either. JPD (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- But it doesn't. There are a number of small settlements outside Canberra city which are still part of the ACT. But I can't find a source on the net showing that Canberra is the ACT's capital, although that's what everyone's always been taught... JRG 14:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- In which sense? It could be called the capital simply because it is the seat of government, but it is not formally declared the capital, is it? It does seem a bit bizarre to describe Canberra as the captial of the territory that was created only to contain Canberra. JPD (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- The one thing for sure is that Canberra is not the ACT. I have seen somewhere (ABS maybe?) the ACT and Canberra referred to separately and there is a population of about 400-500 people that live in the ACT but not in Canberra. Whether it has been proclaimed as the capital of the ACT I'm not sure - maybe it is just a de facto capital, rather than a capital de jure. JRG 22:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
What a load of rubbish you dont know what you are talking about, of course Canberra is the Capital of the ACT, it is also the Capital of Australia too.
- Since I started this debate, I can say that I lived in Canberra for over 27 years and I never once heard it referred to as the "capital of the ACT". Afaik, the ACT simply has no capital, because it so closely overlaps, in a population sense, with Canberra. Would you assist us all by providing a reference for that last statement? -- JackofOz 08:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

