User talk:Linkin park rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ln of x (talk • contribsblock log • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/l/o/g/Special%7ELog_01d8.html).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 22:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have been blocked merely for trying to contact User : AnemoneProjectors to try to justify my edits. This account has been used for no other edits to any other pages. Why has it been blocked? I was originally blocked indef about 2 weeks ago for 'trying to evade a block'. This was inadvertent. I didn't realise it was such a crime to edit with an anon IP when my actual account was blocked. I was blocked indef, by user : philippe. I tried to appeal to his better nature by asking him calmly to reconsider on his talk page, but received a sarcastic and unhelpful response. Since then I've tried to restore my edits using sockpuppets since this is the only option I have to edit wikipedia and contact the administrators. My edits are mercilessly reverted by these 2 administrators who have a grudge against me. I tried to talk calmly to anemoneprojectors but he just deleted my message on his talk page (a bit immature) and couldn't be bothered to read it. And yes, I did ude this account to write some obscenities on his page but I lost my temper OK. I'm sick of this shit. My edits so not violate WP : POV as that article says that different points of view may be represented. My edits represent the points of view of significant numbers of people."


Decline reason: "You admit to blatantly continuing to violate WP:SOCK. Your continued refusal to abide by our policies shows quite clearly that it would be inappropriate to unblock you at this time. Additionally, unblock consideration is not done to abusive accounts set up to avoid a prior block, such as you have done here. Only the sockpuppeteer account is eligible for unblock consideration. — Yamla 23:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.