Talk:Line of succession to the Bruneian throne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Line of succession to the Bruneian ThroneLine of succession to the Bruneian throne — Throne is not a proper noun, so it shouldn't be capitalized. —Morhange (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Also nominating:

[edit] Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support as nom. Morhange (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support with "to the", not "of the" Charles 23:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose, notably the 'to the' > 'of the' change. Also, what about the British throne, which uses 'to the', as an example? It seems to me you are proposing only low-traffic thrones (hehe) so you can then use the 'look-other-articles-use-it' reason for renaming the high-traffic ones too. +Hexagon1 (t) 04:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
    Oh my, I didn't even notice that... I'm changing my vote with a caveat. Charles 04:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
    Oops, that was a mistake on my part. XD Sorry about that. Morhange (talk) 23:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
    OK, changing to Support. +Hexagon1 (t) 01:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support there's no reason for throne to be capitalised. PeterSymonds (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.