User talk:LimWRtacCHsua

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user may be a sock puppet or impersonator of Panairjdde.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde for evidence. See block log
Notes for the suspect Notes for the accuser

Based on your answers at the above page, I have determined you are blocked used Panairjdde, & have blocked this account also. -- llywrch 19:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "silly deduction"

Decline reason: "see below"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

this edit of yours says it all --pgk(talk) 22:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't get it, could you explain better?--LimWRtacCHsua 22:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Blocked editor: your unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request. seems pretty clear to me, do not replace the unblock tag. I guess I read the context of that particular comment incorrectly with it being interpretable in a couple of conflicting ways, the overall converstation with you as the blocked user insisting the account is "closed". which as noted several times is not possible there is no such thing as a closed account is a clear trait of the blocked user --pgk(talk) 06:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  1. I am not saying my account is closed. User:Panairjdde wrote (final post) that he changed his password to a random one, and can't login anymore, so his account is closed.
  2. I won't re-add an unblock tag to this page, but you motivated the unblock rejection with a link ("this edit of yours says it all") that you admitted you misinterpreted. So, would you reconsider unblocking me?
--LimWRtacCHsua 18:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)