Talk:Light Reaction Battalion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Light Reaction Battalion article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

	This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Grammatical errors

There are some errors here and there. If anyone could help please do. If you can't actually help and don't know how to fix it, please don't touch it. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ominae (talk • contribs) 07:59:33, 2008-01-03

Made some very minor changes. Will work on this more over the weekend so that it's more consistent with the sources you provided. Good job on the revamp though, old section felt a bit copy and pasted. :) --Edward Sandstig (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)