Talk:Lifeforce (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Films     (Rated Start-Class) Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale. Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no WikiProject Horror     (Rated Start-Class) This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Science Fiction     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article. Feel free to add your name to the participants list and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] External link

• Video capture (contains nudity)

Excuse me but exactly which tome of Wiki law does it violate to observe the physical characteristics of the space vampire?

• It's considered a violation of WP:OR to state that the female space vampires have nice boobs. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • That's ridiculous. This observation is no different than the one made as to the female space vampire's nudity. Or that fact that she's beautiful.

• I have to wonder whether any of the people who continue to vandalize my edits to this page have ever seen this movie. And if so, exactly what it is about the movie that stands out foremost in their minds today? Is it the plot? Hell no! The writing? Absolutely not! The acting? With apologies to Patrick Stewart, I can get a better performance from the local hobos for a mere pint of Thunderbird. No, quite clearly, the only indelible image imparted by this travesty of a film is the very sweet and lovely space vampire, and it strains credulity to deny that her greatest asset in terms of physical appearance is in fact her nice boobs. It is the only thing worth of note in this movie and if any of you were honest, you'd let my edit free.
  • Here I am, participating on the talk page. I think the passage describing Matilda as having nice boobs is appropriate, it is simply the truth, and it is really all that stands out in this film. I do not see why this wikipedia entry should not reflect that, and so I will make the edit again. Ideally, you all follow the rules here, you will all participate on the talk page if you do not agree. You have to abide by the rules too. This isn't vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.106.6.12 (talk) 16:20, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

I feel that reducing Matilda to a brief comment about her breasts is an insult to female space vampires everywhere. Wikipedia needn't stoop that low, in my opinion. C d h (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lifeforce.jpg

Image:Lifeforce.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)