User talk:Lielei
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Civility warning
This would be a good time to remind you to assume good faith regarding others' edits and to remain civil on talk pages. DMacks 23:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Prod tag
[edit] MaNGOS
A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article MaNGOS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. shoy (words words) 13:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- MaNGOS is very important open source project for MMORPG server game, it can simulate World of warcraft very smoothly, alought to establish a pbulic wow server is illegal. actually lots of illegal wow server s are based on this project, regardless it breaches policy and license of MaNGOS. So please keep this article.
- One of my friends if doing his project based on research the code structure of Mangos.
- I don't understand! wikipedia suppose to be open to discuss any issue, in terms of deletion of MaNGOS, I leave the message in discussion page, and leave the message here. But there is no reply no discussion! only deleted by silence. what wrong with this it is not wikipedia style. I need to discuss with somebody. I think the deletion is vandalism. Future more, the deletion tag says it will keep for 5 days but only one day it is deleted. Somebody explain to me. without explaination and discussion just give me a link to general deletion policy which may not apply to this. I am not satisfy with this.
- Wikipedia is open, but the subjects need to be notable enough, and they should be backed by independent sources (e.g. not only citations of the project's web page, etc). This is the reason why the article was deleted following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaNGOS; subsequent deletion follow from this discussion. If you can find independent sources that assert the notability of the project, then you are welcome to recreate the page in a few days. If you just recreate the page with the same content, it is likely to get deleted again. If you believe that the original discussion reached an incorrect conclusion, you can ask for a review. All the best, Schutz 00:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand! wikipedia suppose to be open to discuss any issue, in terms of deletion of MaNGOS, I leave the message in discussion page, and leave the message here. But there is no reply no discussion! only deleted by silence. what wrong with this it is not wikipedia style. I need to discuss with somebody. I think the deletion is vandalism. Future more, the deletion tag says it will keep for 5 days but only one day it is deleted. Somebody explain to me. without explaination and discussion just give me a link to general deletion policy which may not apply to this. I am not satisfy with this.
[edit] Deletion Review
Note that I am not an administrator, and thus do not have the power to delete pages. I only placed a tag on the page that signalled that the page could be speedy deleted by an administrator. If you look at the log page for MaNGOS, you can see the names of the administrators that DID delete the page. Thanks, shoy (words words) 00:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
