Talk:Libertarian perspectives on foreign intervention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The grammar of this page is so tortured that it's difficult to discern any meaning. To the extent that any meaning can be discerned, it appears to not be factually correct. This page should either be rewritten to be readable and true or it should be deleted. Mcarling 11 Jan 2004, 12:24 (UTC)

Maybe I am stupid, but I can't make any sense of this article at all. I can't even understand it enough to disagree with it. --pstudier 06:57, 2004 Feb 19 (UTC)

Looking at the article right now, I can't help but concur. The last edit seemed to be someone's attempt to clean it up, but the article seriously needs a complete overhaul. I might try my hand at it within the next few days. - Korpios 06:15, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:168.143.113.116 left this comment on the article page: I've left the rest of this article alone in case it makes sense to someone. Since he is the fourth person to indicate that he does not understand the article, I moved his comment here, deleted everything except what he added, and added the Stub notice. pstudier 23:04, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)

If you're going to quote from pro-Israeli "Free Radical", then someone should quote Lew Rockwell or Sobran or some other anti-Zionist libertarian. It's my impression that the majority of Libertarians are anti-Zionist.

I'm not sure what your issue is. The Free Radical quote acknowledges both sides. I have no idea what Free Radical's opinions are on Israel. The quote says "Other libertarians believe that [Arabs] wouldn’t hate us enough to strap bombs if it weren’t for our outspoken support of Israel and presence in the region." I link to both Rockwell and Rand, which pretty much covers the whole spectrum. Dave 05:23, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC) (edited my post when I reread the objection)