Talk:Libby Copeland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the District of Columbia WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to District of Columbia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Creating controversy versus being controversial

Copeland writes controversial articles, but herself is not a controversial journalist.

Creating controversy deals with the content of journalist's writing. Being controversial has to do with the personal life of the reporter herself.

Compare: Ann Coulter's editorial writing and statements to the media to support those writing are controversial, but their is little about her personal life which is truly controversial. In contrast, Deborah Norville's journalism on the Today show was fairly straight-ahead, but the fact that she was perceived as ousting Jane Pauley was controversial.

-Cranky1000 17:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)