Talk:Lenticular cloud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright? One seems to have a copyright notice on it.

Charles Matthews 06:20, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

Images that have not been explicitly copyrighted are subject to the doctrines outlined by Fair use. Ferg 06:50, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

• Sorry, but this is flat-out wrong. Copyright is created the moment the image is created. Unless released into the public domain or otherwise licensed, all images are copyrighted. Using copyrighted images in Wikipedia, in most instances, is not allowed by fair use. George Bluth 03:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Fair use images are "second class" here - not every imagined WP use - such as CDROM encyclopedia sold for money - are compatible. Fortunately in this case there are plenty of better US government images that are also PD - try 'lenticular clouds gov' in Google to see some candidates from NASA and NOAA. Stan 13:37, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Locations in the U.S.

Is it really appropriate to list locations in the U.S. where lenticular clouds occur? I mean, they're unusual but they're not that rare. I've seen them in the Owens and Indian Wells Valleys of California (formed by air coming over the Sierra Nevada) and at Palomar Mountain in San Diego County, California. I could add these, but it seems like we'd soon end up with a list of all reasonably tall mountain ranges in the U.S. And what if people in other countries started doing the same? -- Coneslayer 22:12, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)

I've seen them while I was in the Pinos Altos/Silver City area I was at while I was in New Mexico. Martial Law 06:34, 22 November 2005 (UTC) :)

Sometimes these things would be all over the place.Martial Law 06:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC) . . what's all the fuss about, guys? i thought we were just talking about clouds here...

[edit] Page rename

I propose this page be renamed to "Altocumulus lenticularis" (and a redirect created). This would keep the article name in convention with the others. Dddstone 18:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)