Talk:Least Tern
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the article on [California Least Tern should not have been destroyed
The article Californian Least Tern was destroyed in a merge into least tern. the article covered an important subspecies in california and was focussed and well written on that subject. that article and its history should be restored. Least Tern can stand as it is. Anlace 16:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed Californian Least Tern stands on its own and the article on it that was obliterated should be restored. I don't care what happens with the article on Least Tern; it was obviously improved by importing so much text from Californian Least Tern, so it can be left alone.Covalent 17:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- So do it. There's nothing that prevents you from making an article at California Least Tern. howcheng {chat} 17:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

