Talk:Learning object metadata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Copy and Paste Job

Um...this isn't an article about "IEEE P1484.12 Learning Objects Metadata Standard", but rather this text was simply cut and pasted from said document, ie: this is some sort of introductory text from the standard itself. I have no idea if there are any copyright issues with our reproducing part of an IEEE standard, but this is certainly not a proper article. I'll try to look into what can be done here tomorrow. func(talk) 05:47, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Neil fixed this in the revision mentioned below.--Philbarker 10:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revision

Hi all

We have material which we would like to add to this page, regarding IEEE LOM. Based on http://metadata.cetis.ac.uk/guides/WhatIsLOM.pdf, would anybody object to the overwriting of material already present here? The wikified draft is available at Learning object metadata/draft. Fedgin 14:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Article overwritten N.Fegen 08:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion for further addition

Although the heading is Learning Object Metadata, most of the content is about part 1, the information model: it would be good to have something on the XML binding and maybe something on RDF work so far. --Philbarker 10:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MediaWiki LOM

I know it wouldn't be proper to place this in the article since it's a kind of self reference, but there has been some discussion at Meta about developing a Wikiversity/MediaWiki version: MediaWiki LOM. Expert help is very likely needed (as if there's not enough to do already ;). • CQ 23:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)