Category talk:Law stubs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Sub-categories

I've noticed quite a few articles in the generic "law-stub" category that fit better in the sub-categories (i.e. Canadian-law-stub, UK-law-stub, etc.). Wouldn't it be best for us to go through the many articles in the "law-stub" category and recategorize when appropriate? --Micahbrwn 05:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

absolutely. They have been sorted in the past but it always happens that the generic labels pile up and need to be sorted again. PullUpYourSocks 18:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about edits, but could we send in a bot or two to sort out the stubs? --Micahbrwn 00:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Book stub?

What about a "law-book-stub"? Would there be enough to justify it, including books on the Supreme Court, international law, copyright law, legal history, etc etc? Her Pegship 16:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)