Talk:Laura San Giacomo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]


Contents

[edit] I believe she may have other "attributes"

Now, do you have anything to add regarding her movies, acting skills, or anything else?

Atlant 23:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Personally I was wondering if anyone could add more about her breasts. Six paragraphs doesn't seem to capture every last detail conceivable about two fleshy orbs.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.73.52.194 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] Breast size

(I can't believe I'm doing this) Do we have any citations claiming (even as a rumour) that her bra size is 34D? They look substantially larger to me, though Ms. San Giacomo may be quite short in real life and so they may appear larger than they actually are. --Yamla June 30, 2005 20:51 (UTC)

I think this article has gone a little far on the subject of her breasts. MK2 1 July 2005 01:13 (UTC)
Agreed. Fire Star 1 July 2005 01:13 (UTC)
Now, does anyone have a more-attractive picture of her? For example, one that wasn't shot with a wide-angle lens a few inches from her chest? (I mean, look at the size of her head in proportion to her body!)
Atlant 1 July 2005 11:15 (UTC)
Those are at least double if not triple D. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.221.221.188 (talk • contribs) .

For those who missed it, there was a complete section of this article - eight paragraphs long - discussing Laura San Giacomo's breasts. If it hadn't been deleted, I was going to suggest it be split off and turned into a seperate article. Maybe we could start a whole category of celebrity bodyparts articles: Laura San Giacomo's breasts, Paul Newman's eyes, Betty Grable's legs, Jimmy Durante's nose, Jennifer Lopez' ass. MK2 16:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

One might get the impression that a lot of Wiki editors are 12-14 year old boys; breast size seems to make a big impression on them.
Atlant 17:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


i cant believe im doing this now....

even though her breast size was a somewhat running gag on the show, i dont think it should be incorporated on her personal page. all the "information" is specualtive, and has no place in an area designated to talk about her body of work. if it stayed on the page, why not put it under the notes as a single sentence? i suggest moving the larger part of the article to the just shoot me page. maybe in the notes section, which could eventually be turned into a "running gag" list--Macready 06:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

They never looked that big to me. I've seen just about every episode, and her breasts wer nowhere near a D cup. They looked like a B cup, MAYBE large B cup tops. TJ Spyke 06:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oh what a picture

That is a completely unflattering picture of Ms. Giacomo. Certainly, someone has something better to post. How about a picture of her as Nadine in The Stand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GestaltG (talk • contribs) .

I dunno... It seems pretty flattering to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.208.241.192 (talk • contribs) .


The fact that 8 paragraphs of breast talk were deleted is a sure sign that Wikipedia is broken. Put it back.

-- Dylan 69.11.48.26

Hey, I will replace her picture with a new one. Hope nobody minds.

P.S. This article is full of personal comments (e.g. "if nothing else, the actress"...). It is more like a TV magazine article than a Wikipedia article. Unsuitable in terms of style, it should undergo a cleanup (good command of language, though!) Xanthi22 00:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

Ok, now I'm thinking it, I'm not removing the already existing picture (which is awful). I will just add a new one (the movie poster from Nina Takes a Lover). I've found better pictures of her but they are either copyrighted or I don't know the source(many viscaps, too). If somebody objects to the new picture, please let me know.

Xanthi22 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

That image was copyrighted, too, and was being used to depict San Giacomo, not the movie, so it was a copyright violation. Sorry, I had to remove it. --Yamla 03:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New pictures

I've posted two new images. In case they are also deemed unsuitable, please let me know.

Xanthi22 21:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeap, sorry, neither were suitable. Both were from movies and were being used to depict the actress rather than the movie or character played. --Yamla 22:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I strongly disagree and I've reverted the pictures back in. At least these photos look like her, rather than looking like a study of her breasts (like that awful picture we've had for months now).
Atlant 20:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
It's not a matter of whether or not the pictures are better. It is a violation of copyright to use these images. --Yamla 21:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for clarifying that!
Atlant 21:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok, Yamla is right. However, how come that the articles on Tom Cruise, Demi Moore, Sigourney Weaver, Katie Holmes, Jack Nicholson and possibly hundreds of other actors also feature screenshots from their movies? Why weren't those photos (many of which go way back, to 2005) been deleted, given that they are also copyrighted images and are used to depict the actors rather than the movie or the character played?
Xanthi22 22:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)