Talk:Last Post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Redirect to Taps??

As far as I can tell this article references what is known in the United States as "Taps." Should we simply supplement that article with the "Last Post" info and use this as a redirect page?

Onlyemarie 03:24, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Er, no. They're completely different bugle calls. The Last Post (UK and Commonwealth) sounds nothing like Taps (USA). -- Necrothesp 20:21, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In the Taps article it says they are the same. I wonder...Onlyemarie 06:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Well, being very familiar with both of them, I can assure you they're not. Anyway, it doesn't say they're the same - it says they're "equivalent", which is not the same thing at all. God Save the Queen is "equivalent" to The Star-Spangled Banner - it doesn't make them the same piece of music. -- Necrothesp 00:59, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The page does appear to claim that Last Post is used today in the US for military funerals. I'm quite sure this is incorrect -- the US military uses only Taps for this purpose, as far as I'm aware, and Last Post is completely unknown in the US. Having lived in both Canada and the US, I join with Necrothesp in stating that Last Post and Taps are completely different bugle calls, even though they are used in the same way in their respective countries. -- Richwales 22:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

The Last Post and Taps are very similar. I would go so far as to say that Taps is a simplified version of The Last Post.

I suggest you listen to the calls. There is no resemblance except in the few few notes. -- Necrothesp 12:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

I HAVE listened to the calls. We sang Taps at the end of every Guides meeting, and played the Last Post at every rememberance day. They are incredibly similar, in a theme and variations stylee.

Well, you're entitled to your opinion of course. But being very familiar with both of them, I completely disagree. -- Necrothesp 18:04, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
I wonder whether the seeming similarity may be due to the fact that they're both bugle calls — necessarily restricted to the notes of the harmonic series, and sharing a tendency to go up and down the harmonic series by single steps. Both Taps and Last Post, for example, use the four-note descending sequence G-E-C-G. But I really don't think that's enough to make them "incredibly similar." Richwales 07:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Taps and The Last Post are different pieces of music. However similar they may be they cannot be identified as one and they same. The Last Post is played the same way every time and so is Taps. It isn't like The Last Post is just Taps when mistakes are made, or vica-versa. They are clearly two seperate pieces of music. Symphonies from the same era can sound very similar but you can hardly say they are the same piece, can you? Secondly, the fact they are used differently (in different countries) should be enough to seperate them. The point is to enlighten, not confuse people. If people want to know about The Last Post then they should be able to find out about The Last Post. Depending which country they are from they might not care at all about Taps or vica-versa. Finally, as an Australian I know I would find it offensive if the tribute my country plays to soldiers who have died was confused with the tribute of another country. I've been living in America and I'm sure that Americans who have lost love ones in the line of duty would feel the same way. Different countries have different militaries, and different tributes, which in itself should be enough to seperate them. They are different and shouldn't be referred to as the same.


I'm relieved I didn't see this discussion at the time or I would have probably got so angry I'd have had a heart attack. (And then someone could have played the LP for me!) Now I feel quite calm so I will just add my (considerable) weight to those saying that they are in no way the same piece of music. They are not even that similar. Richwales was absolutely right when he pointed out that there's a kind of superficial similarity based on the fact that they are both bugle calls - yep, there is only so much you can do with six notes. But to suggest that they are "incredibly similar" - er, no, they are not. A fingerprint expert would walk away. Sherlock Holmes would go "yer what?" It's like saying that all Beach Boys tunes are the same tune, or that oranges are really bananas, or that Bach and Handel should be rolled into one article because they both wrote in D Major. It won't wash! Phew, glad I got that off my chest - back to suspended animation. (Ex-wikipedian) 138.37.199.199 16:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger with Military tattoo

Why on earth would we want to merge this with military tattoo? They're completely different things. Yes, the Last Post is usually played in a military tattoo, but they are most certainly not the same thing. -- Necrothesp 11:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. The Last Post is a piece, not an event!

Quite. The merger, I am pleased to see, was not treated as a serious suggestion. 138.37.199.199 16:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


There should be 2 seperate articles one for Last Post the bugle tune and "The Last Post" which is an event, a daily ceremony in Ypres , at the Menin Gate

The former is worth of an article to describe the tune, the origin , the relation to others like Taps, Tatoo, etc

the latter has a wealth of history, and a massive dose of symbolic meaning, of rememberance , and a message of peace true they are closely related, but the daily Last Post is something of near sacred status in parts of Belgium and the whole of the UK, and Brittish Commonwealth

if the tune merges with "military tatoo" then "the last post" should most definately remain as a reference to Ypres and the Menin Gate

Just for the record I think, with apologies for any offence, that many of the above comments are wrong too. The current situation is actually not too bad with a main bugle call article (which, while not without problems, is pretty good) and various sub-articles, including this, on certain specific calls. That all seems to me to be quite healthy and wiki-like and I would hotly oppose attempts to interfere and merge and nonsense like that proposed earlier and fortunately defeated or ignored. Turning to the suggestion that a Last Post article should ever remain solely an article about the Menin Gate ceremony, I honestly do think it's a seriously bad idea. To suggest in effect that the Menin Gate IS the Last Post, or that it is its most important manifestation, is simply not right. The Menin Gate ceremony is of undoubted importance and it is right that it is mentioned both here and elsewhere. But this article is and should be primarily about the bugle call and its use, not about one very specific use. The Menin Gate despite its significance does not hold a monopoly on this tune. 82.45.248.177 12:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recording

This article needs a recording of the call, or at least a link to one. Any ideas? Modest Genius talk 23:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fark?

Do we really need the Fark bit? It seems possibly a bit too trivial for an encyclopaedia article. Lots of people and sites make use of the Last Post tune or concept but they do not all need to be listed here. Opinions please? 138.37.199.206 10:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I see someone zapped it. Thank you. 82.45.248.177 12:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Music excerpts

A couple of small things about the music excerpt. I think it is excellent to have the music. I am a bit baffled that:

a. this article has no direct link to the full music which is to be found at bugle call - so, without inside knowledge, you do not readily find all the music from this article

b. this article's excerpt does not agree with the full music. The other version has a quaver (eighth-note) as the third note played - this has a crotchet or quarter-note. I am not saying that one is necessarily wrong. B&H's "Kneller Hall approved" version has the quaver, but listening to the RM buglers playing at the Cenotaph on Sunday I'd say they do quite a few substitutions along these lines. So maybe there is no one right version. But I do think that we should either be consistent, or at least explain the inconsistency, as the current situation seems to hold some potential confusion.

Views please? Thanks 82.45.248.177 13:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Not sure about the variations. As to the full music, there is also Image:Last Post.png, which has less in the way of phrasing marks than Image:Bugle Calls Last Post.svg, but comes with LilyPond source, and so is readily editable (just edit the source at http://wikisophia.org/wiki/User:EdC then save and re-upload the image). EdC 23:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Amazing. I had no idea that all this text > music stuff existed (ignorant, old etc) and I am looking forward to playing with it. I see that someone else has already substituted the full score for the extract, which seems like a good move. The question of exact versions might be returned to some time. For now, no-one is going to get shot or sacked for playing either of the current versions, I feel! Thanks 82.45.248.177 09:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
And I've moved the music to its own page on Wikisophia: http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Last_Post where anyone can edit it without worrying about treading on my feet. EdC (talk) 00:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)