Talk:Lamborghini Silhouette
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | |
I think it might make sense to have one article called Lamborghini V8 cars that would include the content of Lamborghini V8, Lamborghini Urraco, this article, and Lamborghini Jalpa. There is not much in each individual article and much of what is there is repeated in the other articles. Do you think this would be a good idea? Respectfully, SamBlob 12:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
My personal opinion is to keep individual pages for each car, since they were individual models. Whilst they do have similarities, they were separate cars. I agree though that the articles are are skimpy and would benefit from more content. There's got to be somebody who knows more about these cars that can give more history on them. --Notorious Biggles 12:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
I was about to submit a vote for 'one article per model' with supporting arguments adduced when I noticed that Notorious Biggles had already entered all my strongest arguments. So ... I agree with NB. Outside of these Lamborghinis, if you SOMETIMES have one page for several models and sometimes give individual models their own page, then people don't know what to look for. And in terms of computer admin logic (and given the extent to which Wiki articles depend on links) "one to one" relationships are always (at last in my experience) light years more administratively manageable than "one to many" relationships and / or (not quite) random combinations of "1:1"s and "I:>1"s. Given the desirability of making the articles more beefy, has anyone armed with the appropriate language knowledge attempted to check and where appropirate translate chunks from the German and / or Italian language articles, if any exist for the affected models (and I'm pretty sure that the Uracco, at least, gets already a bit of a write-up in German, and there may, as far as I can tell, also be a brief expose of a complementary view in the Dutch entry)? Charles01 13:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
These models are all unique and deserve separate pages, the management issues above only seal the deal. --scottst ??:??, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
