User talk:Lagos, Ricardo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was never notified as of the reasons for the block. I clearly stated by position as to why Nae'blis shouldn't be admin. I believe it to be unacceptable for an admin not to know IPA and I have a right to state my opinion. If this is not allowed, I'd like to plead mercy and the "assume good faith" policy. Thanks."


Decline reason: "It is highly unlikely that a new user would start !voting on RfA's with no contribs, therefore your account was suspected as a vote manipulating sockpuppet and therefore blocked. -- Tawker 23:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Sockpuppet of whom? I swear I am not a sockpuppet. I voted on RfA because it seemed interesting. i didnt know one could not vote without previous contribs. My apologies. Still, ASG applies and I dont think those who are ignorant of the IPA should be admin. Answer promptly, please Lagos, Ricardo 23:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Also, I think you pulled the same thing off here[1]. So consider this a username block as well. Yanksox 00:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't know the other Lagos user. Don't change the subject please. Lagos, Ricardo 00:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm still blocking you for your username. I find it highly odd that after he is blocked you come up with a name like that. Don't insult my intelligence. Yanksox 00:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)