Talk:L-5 Sentinel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L-5 Sentinel article.

Article policies
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Merging from "Stinson L-5" into "L-5 Sentinel"

My reasons to merge these two articles in the manner presented are as follows
  1. The article name convention of other planes is their aircraft series number and their knickname (i.e. KC-135 Stratotanker, B-52 Stratofortress, etc.).
  2. The USAF lists this aircraft as the "L-5 Sentinel" on their AFHRA website.
  3. The article is about a military aircraft, not a civilian aircraft, and the naming convention should reflect that.
  4. Admittedly, the "Stinson L-5" article has more information and data than the "L-5 Sentinel" article, but the article should follow the standard naming conventions.

Please add your comments, thoughts, criticisms, and accolades below! - NDCompuGeek 02:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Stinson L-5 should be merged into this. Respectfully, SamBlob 03:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge has been effected. Respectfully, SamBlob 17:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] For More Information

This text taken from the 'Stinson L-5' discussion:

For more information on the Stinson L-5, see [1]

NDCompuGeek 02:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)