User talk:Kuzemsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Image-Kuz5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Kuz5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Kuzemsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 16:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander Kuzemsky

Thanks for the article, I have cleaned it up a little bit. I guess the article is about you or your close relative. Usually it is very difficult to be neutral when writing about yourself that is why we have a policy named WP:AUTO, it would be much better to write about physics or other physicists than about yourself.

The second problem is notability. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a Who is Who listing every academics in existence. It has much stricter criteria of notability WP:PROF in a nutshell the subject of the article should be more notable than an average Professor working in a major western University. Because of the "systematical bias" there are even less articles on Russian scientists, so the requirements are even higher. Please read WP:PROF and see if you are ready to provide required references. If not, I could move the article into your userspace.

Please understand me correctly, there is no question you are much more notable then all wikipedia "experts" in physics and Russian science. The question is if the subject is worth to stand in the same raw as Einstein, Newton or Landau. We have articles on less than 5% of members of the Russian Academy of Science, thus, in a way the requirements are higher in Wiki than in RAS. Alex Bakharev 16:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that notability is established by references to publications of independent parties who evaluate the notability of the person. Wikipedia editors cannot declare someone's importance themselves, only by refence to published opinions of pers of the person in question. I understand that for scientists it is much more difficult than for porn stars. A good indication may be person's citation index (rather than the list of publications). `'mikka 01:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)