Talk:Kutha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of the ancient Near East WikiProject. Please participate by editing this article, and help us improve articles to good article standards, or visit the project page.
plan of the stonehenge site This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Bad article

This article printed basically nonsense from a fictional book pretending to be a real occult book taking it's name after a fictional book assuming it was real and had no sources whatsoever. The main Cthulhu article in footnote 6 spefically denied these claims, and I've seen no proof for them either. Somebody apparently confused some poorly researched twaddle somewhere for real facts.

In fact the whole thing would probably be better off deleted. DreamGuy 01:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Removed unsourced controversy section.--Isotope23 16:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
No you didn't. The part you removed is the only part that HAD sources.

Unfortunately I missed Castaneda Dentata's edits placed there earlier trying to claim that my section needed verifying when it was in fact his claims that needed it... He has been harassing me on several articles all over this encyclopedia, largely because I pointed out some amazing errors he placed in articles that demonstrate that he doesn't know what he is talking about. The facts are already cited in the actual text that you removed.

You'll note that the supposed reference in the first part isn't a reference at all but a link to an old copy of this article, which means Castaneda is trying to use his own edit as a source for his prior mistakes.

I am fixing the article, restoring the sources and facts that were there, and removing unsupported info.DreamGuy