User talk:Kushal one

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have reached

Kushal Hada's user talk page. The fastest way to reach Kushal is by email Special:Emailuser/Kushal_one.

--Kushalt 01:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

However, if you have something that you consider does not require urgent attention,

Please leave a new message.



Welcome!

Hello, Kushal one, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Bhadani 14:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Archive
Archives
1, 2


Contents

[edit] want category

I want a category for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushal . I wanted to know whether this article about a word and its meaning should have a category to it. Do we have a category for such names?

[edit] Barnstar!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For your sensible but...yes...humourous personality in the light of assistance at the help desk. Best, — Rudget contributions 21:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Oww! Thank you. I'll relish that for a long time, since it's...erm...5 weeks(?) since my last? :) Thanks once again. — Rudget contributions 16:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Graphic Lab Image

Graphics Request It is advisable to check your requests every so often, that way we get feedback. Thank you XcepticZP (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: your comments at WP:N/CA

To endorse the proposal (as you seem to want to do!), there is a page for this at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:ProseTimeline

Template:ProseTimeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spoiler warnings

You wrote in another place:

Hroðulf, sometime in late 2005 or 2006 (date not accurate), there was a surge in using spoiler warning. I do not see any of those now. Could you find out why? Thanks. Kushal 15:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Here are two links about the spoiler warning tag Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_November_8 and Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_November_14. Kushal 19:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

After a very long wikibreak, I am as surprised as you by the utter annihilation of spoiler warnings. This made it hard for me to read Damages (TV series) while watching it. As well as the links you gave, it turns out the case for deleting the warnings was discussed for years at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler before finally throwing out the whole thing in 2007. It doesn't sound like they are coming back any time soon. The culture here at Wikipedia seems to change all the time, despite the complex bureaucracy. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


Thank you for your reply. Yes, Spoiler warning seems to have been a rather comprehensive debate. I thought there might be something to learn for the current debate on Tempate:ProseTimeline. (I do realize that the debate about ProseTimeline is closed by now.) What do you plan on doing with the template (if anything)? Kushal 17:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I would like to edit Template:ProseTimeline to make it a talk page template. I really don't see the point of warning every reader that the article is not up to good article standards. It is bad enough that they have to read ugly prose. However, my assessment of the responses to the template for deletion discussion is that I don't think I will get very far. So I will go click 'edit' somewhere else on the encyclopedia. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

How about changing the template so that it is just a category (nothing shows up in the article, just the footnote) in the article, there is a full explanation in the talk page, and the article gets added to this (lengthy) list of articles in the [[Category:ProseTimeline]]. Even though there was quite some opposition to deletion, most comments——IMHO——were receptive of the need for change. You are a responsible administrator, Hroðulf. I am glad that administrators like you are around. Happy editing, Kushal 18:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)