Talk:Krulak Mendenhall mission
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Krulak Mendenhall mission is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do. | |||||||||||||||||
 |
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on January 2, 2008. | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. |  |
||||||||||||
 FA |
This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| FA |
This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Dodgy sentence
I'm unwilling to change the direct meaning of a sentence without some confirmation, but I've noticed this in the report section:
-
- Krulak asserted at the ARVN officer corps at all levels were very conscious of the Buddhist issue, but believed that most viewed it in a detached manner and had allowed religious differences to significantly affect their internal military relationship. (emphasis mine)
Surely this should be "had not"? Shimgray | talk | 12:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, a transcription error. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Ref 29 needs fixing: "Hammer, pp. 214–214." Epbr123 (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
