User talk:KonigBerserk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello KonigBerserk! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- THLCCD 23:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

[edit] Triple Crown, John Cena -- to clarify

He is a potential champion, JBL and Big Show aren't because they are no longer active wrestlers. I'm putting Cena back in because he has a world and tag reign (like the Unndertaker for example) and needs a IC title reign to be considered a TCC. The argument for the US title paragraph is to explain he is not a current TCC because the US title doesn't count as an alternate for the IC title. John Cena is not to be added to the current list of actual Triple Crown Champions, but there is no harm in listing him as a potential champion because he is actually carrying both titles that Pedro Morales and Bret Hart held as Triple Crown Champions (that is to say Hart was a WWF Champion and WWF Tag team champion, both of which reside around Cena's waist and neck as of this moment). His tag reign makes him a potential champion, not his US reign. The point about Cena is that he is not currently a triple crown champion because his US title reign is not an alternate to the IC title, however if on Monday he were to beat Jeff Hardy for the IC title then he would become an Triple Crown CHampion and the US title would be unimportant. Darrenhusted 02:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Why are you taking Cena out, he holds the WWE and WWE Tag team championships, all he needs to do is beat Jeff Hardy for the IC title and he is a Triple Crown Champion. Undertaker, Batista and Rey have all won the WWE and WWE Tag team titles, they are in the same boat as Cena, so give me a good reason to take Cena off the potential TCC list. He is the most potential at the moment or are you confusing an argument with regards to the US title with Cena's current reign as Tag team champion? He was removed from previous lists because people kept adding him when he had only won the WWE title and had no tag reign, the tag reign makes him a potential triple crown champion becasue all he needs is a IC title reign. I cannot explain it more simply, leave Cena on the list and don't keep taking him off, unless you can explain why a wrestler who currently hold two out of the three eligible titles is less of a potential champion than Mick Foley (who doesn't even wrestle regularly) or Rey Misterio (who is currently injured, and not even on the right brand to win the IC title). This matter is settled. Darrenhusted 17:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Fine Cena is out of the US title paragraph, and is back in the potential champions paragraph, although your logic staggers me because he is a potential champion either way, but if you think the level of intellignece of the wikipeians is such that they can't cope with a person being mentioned twice on one page then so be it. Darrenhusted 19:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Triple Crown Championship

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. TJ Spyke 02:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

No, the WWE and TNA TC's are real and can be sourced. ECW isn't. Removing that tag for no reason is vandalism. TJ Spyke 03:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

What? How the hell is adding the OR tag to something that is original research vandalism?. TJ Spyke 03:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha, yeah right. Several months ago I removed the WCW Triple Crown for the same reason, and there was no argument. It's not vandalism. So stop calling it that and unless you have a source, don't remove the OR tag it it will be considered blatant vandalism. TJ Spyke 03:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The whole point of the tag is to give people a chance to provide proof. One of the core policies of WP is stuff has to be verifiable. TJ Spyke 03:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)