From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, now in the public domain.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knidos article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. To participate, improve this article or visit the project page for more information.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low-importance within classical antiquity.

	Turkey Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Knidos:
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

	Greece Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Knidos, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
Low	This article has been rated as a Low priority article
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

[edit] Comments

[edit] Name

The name has been changed to Cnidus recently, probably by someone who studies Roman history. But it should be Knidos as before because;

1. It's much more of an ancient Greek city than a Roman city. It had centuries of history before the Romans came. 2. I didn't check the unique hits but Cnidus gives 80,000 odd hits, while Knidos gave 173,000 hits. Cretanforever 20:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't feel strongly about this, but here are some thoughts. Point (1) and (3) aren't really relevant according to WP standards; what matters is the common name in English. WP uses Naples, not Napoli or Neapolis (it had centuries of history before the Romans came...), etc. Point (2) is more relevant, but google.com is subject to a variety of distortions; for example, tourist information is overrepresented compared to scholarly information, so it's interesting to compare with scholar.google.com and books.google.com. There, the two spellings are actually pretty close in popularity, but eyeballing the results, it looks as though Knidos is more prevalent in more recent publications. Since the spellings are about equally prevalent in the scholarly and book literature, then we can look at the other arguments, so I agree with you in the end that Knidos is a more appropriate title. --Macrakis 21:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The more so since the name change from Knidos into Cnidus was made on 12 October under the argument that "the correct name of the city is Cnidus not Knidos". Knidos is the last thing that would be a wrong name for the site, in fact neither Knidos nor Cnidus are wrong. And since Knidos is in addition generally becoming more prevalent, I say we should opt for it. Cretanforever 22:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)