Talk:KitKat Crescent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KitKat Crescent article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	KitKat Crescent has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	KitKat Crescent is part of the "York City F.C." series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 7, 2008 Good article nominee Listed March 7, 2008 Peer review Reviewed March 10, 2008 Featured topic candidate Promoted Current Status: Good article

	English football Portal The article on KitKat Crescent is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football.
	This article is supported by the England task force.

	Yorkshire Portal KitKat Crescent is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the Project's priority scale.

[edit] GA Review: On Hold

I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed. As you address each issue, either strike through the statement/place a check mark next to the issue and state how you addressed it. If you disagree with any of the issues I raised, state your rationale for disagreeing after the issue.

1. Can you add a caption for the image in the infobox? Also for the capacity in the infobox, is there a reason it is situated in the center of the infobox instead of being lined up with the rest of the information?

• N Not done There is a caption given under the relevant field, but it isn't showing up. Any ideas? Maybe I could use <br> to show it? Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• I think the problem is in the template {{Infobox Stadium}} rather than specifically this article. The field caption appears not to be mentioned in the documentation either. Keith D (talk) 11:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Looks like a mis-placed pipe in the template, I have left a note for someone who knows the template to have a look. Keith D (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• N Not done Placed like this to keep consistency with FAs like Priestfield Stadium and City of Manchester Stadium, but could change it if you like. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

1. "...concern about their support there had been raised." Is this fan support or financial support or something else? Specify for readers who may question this.

• I've attempted to clarify this, but my source, York City: A Complete Record 1922-1990, doesn't mention who specifically raised this concern. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

1. "due to popular demand as well as complying with the recommendations made in the Taylor Report" Add a wikilink for Taylor Report; some readers may be unfamiliar with it. Y Done
2. "These floodlights are twice as bright as the original floodlights, and also meet the requirements for Division One football.A new drainage system was installed to improve the quality of the pitch during winter, costing several thousand pounds." Fix the spacing between the two sentences.

• Y Done Amended. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

1. "The ground's pitch includes four stands - the David Longhurst Stand..." Use — for the hyphen (view this page in edit mode to see the formatting if you don't know how to do it).

• Y Done Added. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

1. "On February 4, 2004, the club's board announced that an agreement had been reached which would see York City remain at Bootham Crescent until 2015,[5] by which time they are hoping to move to a new stadium.[14]" Single sentences shouldn't stand alone; the information should either be expanded on or incorporated into another paragraph. Is there any other new relevant information about the upcoming move?

• Y Done Added more information. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

These should be easy to fix and shouldn't take too long. Good job getting a few free images for the article. I have left the article on hold for seven days for the issues to be addressed. If they are fixed in this time, I will pass the article. If not, the article may be failed and can be renominated at WP:GAN. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

Good job on addressing the above issues so quickly. I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Concerning the infobox, don't worry about altering the capacity, I just thought it was supposed to be lined up with the other parameters, but if other articles do the same thing then don't worry about it. Continue to improve the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced. I'd also recommend continuing to expand the article especially the last few sections if possible. Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Each new reviewer that helps to review articles will help to reduce the time that articles wait to be reviewed. Keep up the good work, and I hope that you continue to bring articles up to Good Article status. If anyone disagrees with this review, an alternate opinion can be sought at Good article reassessment. If you have any further questions about this review, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)