User talk:Kismetmagic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy deletion of Daniel Rolland
A tag has been placed on Daniel Rolland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fraud talk to me 23:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Linking common words
Hey dude, you're going a little wild there. Please be aware of the guideline Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. Thanks! Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! I thought people might not be familiar with these terms...I'm new at this!!! --Kismetmagic (talk) 01:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Angelo Stagnaro
-
- Hey, no worries! I thought it was a little much to be linking things like liberals and conservatives and nuns. Anyway, thanks for the contributions and happy editing, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Eric...would you mind disambiguating the word "Mass" for me...apparently the link sends the reader to the physical term "mass." How is it done, by the way--Kismetmagic (talk) 01:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Angelo Stagnaro
- You do that by writing it as [[Mass (liturgy)|mass]] and it appears as mass. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] And a welcome message for you
|
