Talk:Kings of Convenience

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
Kings of Convenience are an indie folk-pop duo

They're not technically "indie", as their record label, Astralwerks is owned by EMI... bogdan 12:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

According to the textbook, yes, KOC are not indie because they're signed to a major label. According to a more common definition, they're indie because they're not popular in the mainstream. Much like the Postal Service are indie, so are KOC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.106.43 (talk • contribs)


Contents

[edit] Hiatus

I'm given to understand that the long break between the first two albums was mainly because one of them was doing a degree.

[edit] Discog

Any reason this is in reverse chronological order? MKV 07:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Why are their first 3 releases considered albums? I would place them in the EP, perhaps even Single categories. 60watt 21:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I can't ind no info about the 2000 album called Kings of Convenience... Is there any album with that name? I couldn't find it even at the official website. Filipepaula (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unrelated

Are they triskaidekaphobiacs? Notice how all the albums end at the 12th track.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:QuietIsTheNewLoud.jpg

Image:QuietIsTheNewLoud.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)