Talk:Kimberella
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Kimberella is currently a good article nominee. Anyone who has not contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article, as outlined on the nominations page.
To start the review process, follow this link to create a dedicated subpage for the review. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.) Date: 20:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
 |
Kimberella is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Is it really a mollusc?
With reference to Butterfield, N.J. (2006). "Hooking some stem-group ‘‘worms’’: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". Bioessays 28 (12): 1161–6. doi:.
and reply. [– the reply doesn't pertain to Kimberella.]
These should definitely be summarised in the article!
Verisimilus T 12:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
