Talk:Khmer Empire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page should be properly moved to Khmer empire when someone (myself?? :) finds the time to move existing links there... -- prat
[edit] Proper citation
This article has a list of references at the bottom of the page, but it isn't properly cited. I mean some unverified information may have been added by subsequent users. Just because it lists references, doesn't mean the article is verified or correctly cited. Which is why I added the "unreferenced" tag/template. --Dara 23:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it was the wrong template - 'unreferenced', rather than 'ref improve'. Now that you have changed it I completely agree - the referencing is appalling. I have some of those references, so I'll see what I can dig up in my library to improve things. Cheers, Paxse 18:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Theres a spelling mistake, first line
-
- Yeah, it was. :D The reason why I was so hesitant to re-add a tag was because this is a 'high profile' topic. And some kid doing some research for a report might have used it even though we can't tell for sure if all of the information is true. For all we know, some of it could be made-up and maybe even biased information, though most likely not. --Dara 19:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- There is another good editor who has been working on this article User:Writer128 she/he makes excellent edits - perhaps we could invite him to help us check the facts in this one and give it a major overhaul? Paxse 18:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was. :D The reason why I was so hesitant to re-add a tag was because this is a 'high profile' topic. And some kid doing some research for a report might have used it even though we can't tell for sure if all of the information is true. For all we know, some of it could be made-up and maybe even biased information, though most likely not. --Dara 19:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Japanese settlement
This page makes reference to Japanese settlements in the Khmer Empire during the 17th century, this is unsourced and somewhat dubious. Does anyone have a source for that?Rcduggan (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dravidians
While reading this article, I fing a very strong feeling that all these names are south indian (Dravidian) names. But I don't see any reference to that in the article. Is there any reference about these kings are dravidians or am I simply assumings something here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srbasha (talk • contribs) 07:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

