From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I have commited no vandalism! I reported raymond arritt for wikistalking and accusing me falsely of being a sockpuppet of frogsprog on user talk:MONGO, then when I log in.. i realise MONGO has blocked me! there is no proof that I am a sockpuppet or a vandal! this is ridiculous! additionally, I would like to say that MONGO is violating policy by harrasing newcomers and not assuming good faith KFA UK 20:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Well considering that your account was created less than a week after Frogsprog's ban and that you're edit-warring in exactly the same manner [1] [2] [3] when compared to [4] [5] [6], it's pretty obvious to conclude that you are indeed a sockpuppet. -- Netsnipe ► 19:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I have emailed the admin unblock email please take action and unblock me --KFA UK 19:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "If that admin agrees with you then he/she will unblock you. --WinHunter (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
Checkuser (Dmcdevit) has now confirmed that this account is a sockpuppet of Frogsprog (82.43.244.187). -- Netsnipe ► 19:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
No worries.
Just be careful... Cheers, -- Visviva 15:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Three-revert rule
Please keep in mind the three-revert rule on Wikipedia. This is not a warning, just a friendly note to make sure you're not caught by surprise. --Reuben 16:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)