User talk:KenWalker/Archive Oct 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
British Columbia
It would require a lot of work to get it up to FA standard. It is currently probably closer to a B-class. To do:
- use WP:SS on the history section - cut it from 7 sub-sections to 7 paragraphs. India#History does a good job of this: the history of India in 5 paragraphs.
- less tables, more prose in Demographics.
- elaboration on the Economy.
- prune the See Also link farm.
- provide footnotes where appropriate.
I can help if this is something you want to take the lead in. --maclean 02:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- All good ideas. Sometimes things sit on my todo list a while before they get attention, but this is something I would like to see happen so I will get to some of these things even if it isn't right away --KenWalker | Talk 04:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
|
The Biography WikiProject Newsletter Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007 |
|
Congratulations to our 225 new members |
The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page
Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.
|
|
Complete To Do List
Assessment Progress
|
|
|
|
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.
Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!
This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.
James Hall (Actor)
Hello Sir,
I have added source reference links from third party publications for verification of the material on this upcoming talent.
Is this what you were looking for and referring to with the tag (00:19, 1 July 2007 KenWalker (Talk | contribs) (7,551 bytes) (See also WP:BIO for notability for entertainers, article appears to be written by its subject and lacks sources of content))?
I am new to this and have been trying to help. I just want to know if I am doing it right and that the content source references adequately establish the validity. It would be a shame if this article was deleted. :(
Thank you
Smile
Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
{{WikiProject Canada}}
Hi. Thanks for your efforts in tagging articles as part of WikiProject Canada, but I have had to change a few of them after you. Please note that "impotance=high" is pretty exclusive, and should be limited to subjects and people that everyone has heard of, like former prime ministers and major cities; other articles are either mid or low importance. Also, "cangov=yes" is mostly for the structures of the govenment, not the people in it. For the people, use "ppap=yes". Again, thanks for your help in tagging the articles in the first place. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips. I have noticed your changes and the edit summaries you have left have been helpful. I have also seen the details you have provided on the template page which are well done and clarify things considerably from whatever it was that I looked at before. Thanks for doing that. I have agreed with nearly all of your changes although I thought the Chief Justice of Canada might warrant importance=high. I had wondered about Cangov applying to people and saw something somewhere that made me think it applied to people as well, but it makes more sense to do it as you have laid out. I will follow your recommendations, thanks for sharing them with me. --KenWalker | Talk 20:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- You probably also noticed that I took out the "type=article" tag. Articles are the default even though they don't show up unless you specifically mention it. I think we only need to use the "type" parameter for lists from now on. I agree with you about the chief justice; they should be "high" and the other members of the supreme court should be "mid". If I demoted a chief justice, that was an error on my part. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 006
Note: You have been delivered this notice because you are listed on the WikiProject Biography Spamlist. If you do not wish to receive this notice, remove your name. From the automated, Anibot 16:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Premiers
Oh, I can explain why we had both. For obvious reasons, how we do things on Wikipedia is always in a state of evolution — succession boxes are an older and somewhat outdated way of adding that information to articles. But when the position templates were created, people added them without removing the duplicate succession boxes, and so newer editors presumably got the impression that every article had to have both. There's a creeping process of template overload — every time somebody comes up with an innovative new way of presenting information, it gets copied to other classes of articles, but the people who add the new way don't remove the old way, so the templates just keep piling up. Bearcat 16:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

