User talk:Kateweb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Kateweb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 11:29, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Don't you just love Trolls?
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Nearly Headless Dick 05:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- It was a fake, and the person who placed it was blocked. Feel free to delete the warning and sig. And your reply, and mine. Argyriou (talk) 06:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thanks i'll leave it but strike it. Katie 09:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pyidawtha
Hi Katie. There's a convention on here that articles on real places are automatically notable, as long as a bare minimum of information is there (pretty much, enough to establish that a place indeed exists); see for instance Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panaca, Nevada. Very short articles such as Pyidawtha should be tagged as the appropriate "geo-stub", for instance {{myanmar-geo-stub}}. As for the author removing the speedy tag, yes, that was wrong. Please consider warning authors with {{drmspeedy}} on their talk pages when you see this happening - firstly that way they'll be alerted that there's a message for them (putting it in the edit summary won't alert them) and secondly if they've de-tagged several articles then the warnings (which range from {{drmspeedy}} through {{drmspeedy4}} for repeated deletions) will all be visible in one place. Cheers and a belated Happy Xmas, Tonywalton | Talk 13:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
The problem I had was that it seemeed to be a travel agent and looked like spam I did not so much have a problem with the place as much as how it was presented something just seemed a tad bit off to me. Katie Ewing 13:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. If it's a real place (if it'n the UK, streetmap.co.uk, for instance) just delete or rewrite all the POV ("beautiful pictures: -> "pictures", etc), tag it as a geo-stub and move on to the next new page to be patrolled :-). I know NP patrol is a pain in the /expletive deleted/, and it does make your eyes bleed from time to time! Tonywalton | Talk 22:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah I was starting to think that their should be an article on the bleeding of the eye ball related to the editing of wikipedia pages, today was a rather long and painful day.Katie Ewing 00:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

