Talk:Katharine Weber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

[edit] Copyright confirmation

Created from Wikipedia: Articles for creation entry listed as:

source: www.katharineweber.com (I am the author and this is my own website) 81.65.52.27 16:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Could 81.65.52.27 (talk · contribs) confirm identity and that you release the text for free editing and redistribution under the GFDL. Otherwise someone is likely to tag it as copyright violation. Note also the guidelines at Wikipedia:Autobiography. Tearlach 16:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

I took a first shot at cleaning up the article and cutting down on some of the detail. Let me know what you think. Liamdaly620 19:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Looks good - the rewrite also gets around the cut&paste issues. Tearlach 01:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SmokeLong links

Links to stories and interviews that appear in SmokeLong were removed, apparently because I was the person who added them, and I am the editor of SmokeLong. That said, I've added other links for authors to other interviews and stories in other literary magazines that have a similar relevance to SmokeLong, and those have not been removed. Should SmokeLong not be considered for relevant links just because one of its editors happens to be a Wikipedia editor as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveClapper (talkcontribs) 19:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC) It's been a week, and I've seen no objection, so the link has been re-added.DaveClapper (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)