Talk:Katelyn Tarver
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why delete? What's wrong with my page?
- I see the article too biased toward a fans view, please make it leaned toward to a neutral POV.
- There aren't even any opinions on the page. It is a list of statistics and a small amount of information regarding her CD's. Just because it doesn't say anything about the downsides of her career, it doesn't mean it is biased.
Contents |
[edit] Interview on Wikinews
Hi all!
Katelyn Tarver's publicity people have been cool enough to let me have an email-based interview with her, to be published on this site, called Wikinews. My challenge to you: what questions would you like me to ask her? Either post them to Wikinews (just click "edit this page" when you get there, and type), or email them to me at nicholasmoreau@gmail.com. I'll choose the best questions, and ask them to Katelyn.
Thx all! Nick M. (aka Zanimum)
Zanimum 20:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] imdb
I think imdb is an adequate source for things like when somebody is born (at least for the year, if not the day). But if we use it we should cite it. If we don't use it, we can't keep facts reliant on only it. --Rob 19:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Does the official site in any way mention her birth date? Mad Jack 20:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:EL overkill
I put back the MySpace link. This is an official site. The vast bulk of MySpace links don't belong, because generally they're just anonymous fans making a page for their idol, have nothing special to offer, and have no official status. But a small but growing minority of MySpace are like Avril Lavigne and Tarver, and others *signed* artists, in that they're used by the artist and their label as an ongoing official verhicle for the performer (e.g. not just a leftover from the "up and coming days"). Another major problem with most MySpace pages, is claims of official status can't be verified (e.g. somebody pretends to be who they are not), but Tarver's MySpace can easily be verified to be official.[1] I would make a strong request that people not robotically remove non-spam links, but instead look into each case. And of course, if all somebody has is a MySpace page, they're probably not notable, but again, that's not the case with Tarver. --Rob 00:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Kt-brandnewday.jpg
Image:Kt-brandnewday.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Kt-brandnewday.jpg
Image:Kt-brandnewday.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

