Talk:Karl Rahner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "Borrowing the language of Kant"
Transcendental arguments aren't specific to Kant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.140.3 (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] “Not understandable”
I have added the template
| The text in this article or section may be incoherent or very hard to understand, and should be reworded if the intended meaning can be determined. See the talk page for details. |
at the top of the article, because of the following sentence, to be found in the last-but-third paragraph.
-
- “The presence of God's self-gift, guaranteed as persistent and infallible in the Christ-event, and only prevented from the errors of depraved and idolatrous interpretations by this event, is the center-point of the doctrine of grace.”
With the present wording, the sentence is entirely obscure.
Miguel de Servet 13:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the sentence quoted above is obscure, but it appears to have been altered in the article. Someone should remove the "incoherent" template -- C. Mac Kirnan,18 Feb 2007
- C. Mac Kirnan, what does the phrase "it appears to have been altered in the article" mean? Nobody is going to remove anything until the obscurity of the sentence in the article has been clarified. Miguel de Servet 12:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Rahner's language can be very difficult for those who have not spent a lot of time reading his work. It seems that this article would benefit either from some explanation on the terms quoted from Rahner for those readers who may not be familiar with his work.67.184.64.100 02:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

