User talk:Kalaw123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 December 2007
2 Image copyright problem with Image:Wowpri.jpg
3 Speedy deletion of Melanie de Laat
4 Speedy deletion of Nadia Pereira
5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missearth07.jpg
6 Duplicate images uploaded
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ME03.jpg
8 January 2008
9 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missearth07logo.jpg
10 your edits have been reverted
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ME'07.jpg

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Miss International 2008. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

If you remove content from a page; please specify why using an edit summary. Otherwise, we have no way to know that your edits are not vandalism. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Wowpri.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Wowpri.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miss Earth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. i will be marking your edits as vandalism if you persist in reverting good faith edits without providing any rationale. please use the talk page to discuss these matters. Anastrophe (talk) 01:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Melanie de Laat

A tag has been placed on Melanie de Laat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Anastrophe (talk) 01:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Nadia Pereira

A tag has been placed on Nadia Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Earth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 01:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Earth 2008, you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Please communicate with your fellow editors on the article talk page. your edits are inappropriate. Anastrophe (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Earth 2008, you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missearth07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missearth07.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Earth 2003, you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 02:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:ME03.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:MEP03.jpg. The copy called Image:MEP03.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 02:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ME03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ME03.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Miss Earth 2008, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 08:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missearth07logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missearth07logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] your edits have been reverted

until you communicate with your fellow editors and provide a rationale for your unsourced additions and uploads of copyright violating images, all of your edits will continue to be reverted. Anastrophe (talk) 07:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Earth 2007. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. removing reliably sourced material constitutes vandalism if no reasonable explanation is provided. Anastrophe (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ME'07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ME'07.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.