User talk:Kaiser262
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Polifonia. Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs |
Contents |
[edit] October 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Puerto Rico, you will be blocked from editing. Agüeybaná 23:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Puerto Rico, you will be blocked from editing. Agüeybaná 00:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
You have been blocked from editing in Wikipedia for violating the 3 revert rule in the article "Puerto Rican flag". Let me remind you that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on verifiable facts and not a political forum. Thank you. Tony the Marine 01:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PRSSA/PR Flag
Thanks for noting my contributions to the PRSSA/AEEEU page. I was particularly concerned at unidentified third parties doing translations that resulted in incorrect information appearing in the page of an organization that has produced so many good Puerto Ricans as the current Resident Commissioner, the Senate president and the former Attorney General Pierluisi.
Changing the subject, the color of the Puerto Rico flag triangle was not set in the PR Constitution. What the Constitution states is that matters pertaining to the PR flag (as well as coat-of-arms and anthem) shall be regulated by law and that any future amendments will not take effect until one year after the subsequent general election. As a matter of fact, there are different views as to the correct color, to the point where the flag in the House of Representatives is a darker blue than that in the Senate, both NPP-ruled legislative bodies. I once heard the Senate President explain that he preferred the "historically correct" lighter shade. The PR flag used the same colors as the Cuban flag of the late 1800's. Once Cuba became independent and started flying its flag on the high seas, the light blue stripes did not contrast enough with the light blue of the ocean and the sky, the flag appearing to simply be a red triangle from a distance, and Cuban then switched to "navy blue" stripes, but the original color copied from the Cuban stripes to the Puerto Rican triangle was the light "Penepé" Blue! To each his own! Pr4ever (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just ran across the set of the Senate President/House Speaker response to the Governor's State of the "Commonwealth" message last week, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWJ75ugAr0k , see the color of the PR flag. As I said, there's no unanimity among statehooders regarding this issue.Pr4ever (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Improving PRSSA article
Given your interest in the PRSSA article, I suggest you search for additional reliable third-party references that will substantiate some of the facts contained in the article to protect it from being removed. I've been doing what I can. Good luck! Pr4ever (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
